Twan, Donald, Ali, Matthijs: you get the picture, I suppose

Wanneer was het ook alweer? Oh ja: 20 maart 2017. Matthijs van Nieuwkerk hing aan de lippen van een hysterisch opgegeilde Twan Huys, want het ging nu echt gebeuren: de bewijzen dat Trump door Poetin aan de macht was geholpen, zouden nu waarschijnlijk morgen geleverd gaan worden. Of anders uiterlijk overmorgen. Huys had zich geheel natuurlijk in de rijen geschaard van de ranting Democrats en het verdere regressief-linkse tuig dat schuimbekkend de straten van Amerika opging ter viering van het eenheidsfront van zwart fascisme, feministisch fascisme en islamitisch fascisme tegen Trump. Intersectionaliteit ! Inmiddels zijn we weer een dag of tien verder en er is nog geen spoor van bewijs gevonden voor invloed van Poetin op de Amerikaanse verkiezingen.

Hier is een stuk van David Prentice op American Thinker dat er nog eens op wijst dat 1) er geen spoor van bewijs is dat de Russen computergewijs iets met de Amerikaanse verkiezingen hebben gedaan om Trump aan de macht te helpen, 2) zulks ook te idioot voor woorden is omdat het voor Poetin veel voordeliger geweest zou zijn om een halve gare en corrupte push over als Hillary Clinton als president te hebben dan een tough America-first guy als Trump, 3) de door de linkse media en leidende Democrats opgeklopte hysterie gevaarlijke vormen begint aan te nemen.

Ik citeer selecterend en vet en vetblauw makend:

“This nation has faced many a crisis, but not since the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, ginned up by the Hearst media empire, have we had crisis of the current magnitude powered by fake news.

( . . .)

Consider the primary fake narrative that has dominated news coverage since December: The Russians. They did it. Hacked the election. Colluding with Trump. And all the Presidents’ men (and women). Newscasters and editors breathlessly report this stuff every day, all day long. And have for almost four months. With zero evidence. Zero! ( . . .). No facts. It’s worse than much ado about nothing. Yet there they go, reporting as if something happened that should outrage us all. Again. 

Damn those Russians . . . . .

The effect this is having on the left is a marvel. I have yet to witness a group more delusional. I have taken part in enough casual liberal conversations to observe just how close they are to losing their minds. They do this after watching news anchors and other liberal heavyweights hysterically ranting about such things as treason, treachery, selling out our country, and calling the Trump administration puppets of Putin. Likewise, the many interviews of Democrat officials, highly prominent people trying to sell this same narrative of Trump colluding with Russia. They too, do so in the most hysterical manner, trying to engender outrage in those who are listening.

( . . .)

Frankly, their narrative totally falls short. Why in the world would Putin want to change the perfect pliability of the Obama/Clinton pushover axis? Obama was recorded on a hot mic telling “Vladimir” he would have more flexibility after the 2012 election (and boy did he). Obama/Clinton let them take Crimea and Georgia without a peep.  Obama/Clinton apparently (allegedly) signed over 20% of America’s uranium for some huge donations (said to be over 100 million dollars) to the Clinton Foundation plus mega dollars for Clinton speeches that were of no value. The botched Russian reset button, the drawdown of our military, the total feckless weakened foreign policy of Obama/Clinton, and more; the list of reasons for Vladimir to love Clinton are legion.

Occam’s razor:  Given all those facts, why in the world would Putin want to change from the easy marks he had to a bulldog, a fighter, a man of accomplishment who ran on toughness, a man who wanted to reassert America’s greatness, a man who promised to build the strongest military in the world, a man who wanted to vie, compete and beat Russia as a player in the energy markets? 

Why indeed?  Putin had everything he wanted in a feckless woman who could have won. The idea that he wanted Trump is fatuous and just plain laughable. At best.

What’s not laughable are the stooges of the Democrat/media complex. Yes, they are making fools of themselves. Daily. But they are also ginning up a dangerous hysteria. ( . . .). But when I witness the damage being inflicted on the leftist voters, when I see their crazy Facebook posts and their rants on other social media, I know there is a consequence. And it’s not good. Enabling rage over nothingness can never be good. The left is on the brink. God help bring sanity to enough of them before something terrible happens.

_______________

Advertenties